Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Date: 2017-01-27 21:31:22
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ5RsA9Hyu96g9+gsVRxctH1-ULzgfRK77kw761Eqt3Uw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> There is just one line change in 0003 compared to older version, all
> other patches are the same.

I spent some time looking at 0001 (and how those changes are used in
0003) and I thought it looked good, so I committed 0001.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2017-01-27 22:13:24 Re: Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-01-27 21:10:15 Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.