| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process? |
| Date: | 2016-02-09 18:12:23 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ4dTbkRdZ0dqZk4xmGHzGiikg+hoF4Z9GNy3F7eV-H+w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Here's an updated patch series with some more improvements to the
> isolationtester code, and some better test cases.
OK, here's a final set of patches that I intend to commit in the next
few days if nobody objects, per discussion on the thread about
parallelism fixes. It's basically the same as the previous set, but
there's a bug fix and an additional test case.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Specify-permutations-for-isolation-tests-with-invali.patch | application/x-patch | 145.0 KB |
| 0002-Modify-the-isolation-tester-so-that-multiple-session.patch | application/x-patch | 14.7 KB |
| 0003-Add-some-isolation-tests-for-deadlock-detection-and-.patch | application/x-patch | 11.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-02-09 18:26:08 | Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process? |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2016-02-09 17:57:54 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |