Re: Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only)
Date: 2016-07-07 17:51:46
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ40wc6yqZn0hs8ULQ6SgoyhKrQv1=F26HYiDHQAcC6Rw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 3:34 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>> Are you satisfied that I have adequately described steps to reproduce?
>
> I can confirm that (after 62 minutes) your test procedure reached SIGSEGV
> today and then completed successfully with your patch.

Thanks for testing. I've committed this patch, breaking off one
unrelated bit of into a separate commit.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2016-07-07 17:52:30 Issue with bgworker, SPI and pgstat_report_stat
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-07-07 17:29:43 Re: PARALLEL SAFE/UNSAFE question