Re: timezone GUC

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timezone GUC
Date: 2011-09-06 20:25:01
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ374b_6DyLkYSAhN6FNRULWH8UTQgvmpVhO_ON2resqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> Was this dealt with?
>
> Yes, as much as I think is reasonable anyway.  See
> commit e05b866447899211a0c2df31bf0671faac4fc3e5.

I am (and, I think, Alvaro is also) of the opinion that the behavior
here is still not really right.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-09-06 20:35:31 Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-09-06 20:22:57 Re: Cascaded standby message