Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
Date: 2012-07-19 13:41:29
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYyYD7jVADOmKUN7qi1EE_Fw1cmBLArwMStUReyYDuUJw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> No, the point is they run pg_upgrade on the stopped primary and stopped
> standbys. Are those the same? I am not really sure.

Of course not.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-07-19 13:54:09 Re: isolation check takes a long time
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-07-19 13:41:11 reminder: 9.2 branch needs building by buildfarm animals