| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string) |
| Date: | 2011-09-24 19:23:12 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYg-7w15KpvkzgjJGj6Wjuuf9uimZonKH3yBs1bN9Seug@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It seems like everyone agrees that this feature is wanted, but Tom is
> still very much opposed to the general approach to implement it, as
> being too dangerous.
> Is it the reviewer's job to try to convince him otherwise?
It's not the reviewer's job to convince Tom of anything in particular,
but I think it's helpful for them to state their opinion, whatever it
may be (agreeing with Tom, disagreeing with Tom, or whatever).
IMHO, the most compelling argument against the OP's approach made so
far is the encoding issue. I was hoping someone (maybe the OP?) would
have an opinion on that, an idea how to work around it, or something.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-09-24 19:24:49 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-09-24 19:15:25 | Re: Satisfy extension dependency by one of multiple extensions |