Re: Parallel Index Scans

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Parallel Index Scans
Date: 2017-01-24 21:51:12
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYb2fbZTrrynJ54C0wvwXE8r6m7DnE_VCW5aN_rEW_kog@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> In spite of being careful, I missed reorganizing the functions in
> genam.h which I have done in attached patch.

Cool. Committed parallel-generic-index-scan.2.patch. Thanks.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-01-24 21:58:31 Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-01-24 21:47:29 Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal