Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off
Date: 2016-08-04 18:07:30
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYXqpz-dyT4pjBsk-nfwHrNe7rBqAXW0Pr5WbA5JOZktA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2016-08-04 16:48:11 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Here is a different proposal: documenting instead that disabling that
>> parameter on Windows can improve performance, at the cost of losing
>> information verbosity for processes.
>
> The benefit on windows seems pretty marginal, given the way it has to be
> viewed. People installing processexplorer et. al. to view a handle that
> have to know about, will be able to change the config.

I agree. I think it would be fine to disable this on Windows, but I
wouldn't want to do the same thing on other platforms.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-08-04 18:07:46 Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2016-08-04 17:54:04 Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft