Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Date: 2013-01-21 03:07:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYUfevOifhyWqQTGz4RnFbuZV3XYenWrXapuNNVc7Z8yQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On 01/20/2013 09:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> As a junior reviewer, I'd like to know if my main task should be to
>>> decide
>>> between 1) writing a review convincing you or Tom that your judgement is
>>> hasty, or 2) to convince the author that your judgement is correct.
>>
>> That's a hard question.
>
>
>
> I don't think so. IMNSHO your job is neither - it is to give us your
> independent judgment.

That's pretty much what I went on to say.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-01-21 03:11:34 Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-01-21 03:04:22 Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)