Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jun Ishiduka <ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Date: 2011-08-15 11:52:21
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYRKLsDSR6F4tDbgnvE-s7-BLNE+h=XeswRb3tpZs0KEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/8/15 Jun Ishiduka <ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp>:
>> > * Not correspond yet
>> >
>> >  * full_page_write = off
>> >    -> If the primary is "full_page_write = off", archive recovery may not act
>> >       normally. Therefore the standby may need to check whether "full_page_write
>> >       = off" to WAL.
>>
>> Isn't having a standby make the full_page_write = on in all case
>> (bypass configuration) ?
>
> what's the meaning?

Yeah. full_page_writes is a WAL generation parameter. Standbys don't
generate WAL. I think you just have to insist that the master has it
on.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-08-15 12:27:46 Re: SSI error messages
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-08-15 11:50:58 Re: pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage