Re: Tracking wait event for latches

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tracking wait event for latches
Date: 2016-08-22 15:44:14
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY94M3jgaUGYq7MhEzZrcuFpzUf6RXGrCKHVrChX+M9DQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The reason why I chose this way is that there are a lot of them. It is
> painful to maintain the order of the array elements in perfect mapping
> with the list of IDs...

You can use stupid macro tricks to help with that problem...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-08-22 15:46:05 Re: WAL consistency check facility
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-08-22 14:53:25 Re: UTF-8 docs?