| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
| Date: | 2016-06-08 14:29:10 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY595wxVtBkTMqk=pbhsTnd7ZoAjpRS7kzUQnKDFKAfnQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Note that there is a dump/restore hazard if people have set the
>>> parallel_degree reloption on a beta1 install, or used ALTER { USER |
>>> DATABASE } .. SET parallel_degree. Can everybody live with that?
>>> Should I bump catversion when applying this?
>
>> IMHO, we just need to call it out in the beta2 announcement.
>
> catversion is not relevant to GUC changes. It's not really necessary,
> because you'd get a clean, easily diagnosed and repaired failure during
> postmaster startup anyway. The point of bumping catversion is to prevent
> a postmaster starting when the incompatibility is subtler or harder to
> debug than that.
The reloption is also getting renamed here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-08 14:41:17 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-08 14:18:12 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |