Re: [GSoC] current working status

From: Charles Cui <charles(dot)cui1984(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Aleksandr Parfenov <a(dot)parfenov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GSoC] current working status
Date: 2018-06-14 15:29:43
Message-ID: CA+SXE9uxNQKRvKyH+g894qE=NKDRPHSm6EhZn0OFtwQwj=6UMA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

good idea, will keep a feature branch, and set up ci.

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018, 8:03 AM Aleksander Alekseeev <
a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:

> Hello Charles,
>
> > I saw the list of errors you posted. That's because I have some new
> > function implemented and pushed without testing(in order forget my
> > change in local machine).
> > So you are saying it is best to keep each commit workable. Right?
>
> Ideally, yes. You can always create a separate branch to experiment with
> new code and merge it to master branch when it becomes stable. This is
> not a strict GSoC requirement or something like this, but a good
> practice. If something goes wrong you can just delete an experimental
> branch and go back to working master branch.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Aleksander Alekseev
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-06-14 15:31:36 Re: Locking B-tree leafs immediately in exclusive mode
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseeev 2018-06-14 15:03:53 Re: [GSoC] current working status