| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended |
| Date: | 2011-07-29 14:13:50 |
| Message-ID: | CA+OCxoyv3AV1aVYKi78OafFM6dxxDXy02jZO2TtbA8M0EZJ2zw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
>> /postgres-9.1/share/doc/html/manage-ag-overview.html
>> In the folowing partagrasoh 'recommendable' should be 'recommended'.
>
> Seems perfectly ok as-is to me ...
Sounds hideous to me. I ran it past one of our tech writers (Susan
Douglas), who rewrote the sentence as:
If a single PostgreSQL server instance is to house projects or users
that should be separate (for the most part unaware of each other), we
recommend storing them in separate databases.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-07-29 14:41:47 | Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-29 14:03:16 | Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended |