Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
Date: 2011-07-21 19:22:27
Message-ID: CA+OCxoyOJ82gOVE5v_Dx7o-z505Yj2fZ4BEqCQiPkSQCmkyHxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I think the real challenge is going to be testing.  If anyone has a
> machine with weak memory ordering they can give me access to, that
> would be really helpful for flushing the bugs out of this stuff.
> Getting it to work on x86 is not the hard part.

I believe there's a PPC box in our storage facility in NJ that we
might be able to dig out for you. There's also a couple in our India
office. Let me know if they'd be of help.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2011-07-21 19:25:21 Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-07-21 19:15:56 Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful