Re: Why there is a union in HeapTupleHeaderData struct

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Soroosh Sardari <soroosh(dot)sardari(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why there is a union in HeapTupleHeaderData struct
Date: 2013-05-20 12:44:53
Message-ID: CA+HiwqHc3A4=KMogXtW3jazMMgnbWkrY8=LXNfALT==G3xyHzQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Wonder though if this question is better asked in pgsql-novice?

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think a more appropriate question to be asked here would be at what
> point (in the life of a typical tuple), does a tuple's header contain
> t_datum or otherwise, which I would also like to be answered.
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Soroosh Sardari
> <soroosh(dot)sardari(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Thanks,
>>
>> If a tuple constructed in memory we don't need t_heap. I have another
>> question,
>> How make an in-memory tuple?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I think the comment just above the HeapTupleFields struct definition
>>> has the related details.
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * Heap tuple header. To avoid wasting space, the fields should be
>>> * laid out in such a way as to avoid structure padding.
>>> *
>>> * Datums of composite types (row types) share the same general structure
>>> * as on-disk tuples, so that the same routines can be used to build and
>>> * examine them. However the requirements are slightly different: a Datum
>>> * does not need any transaction visibility information, and it does need
>>> * a length word and some embedded type information. We can achieve this
>>> * by overlaying the xmin/cmin/xmax/cmax/xvac fields of a heap tuple
>>> * with the fields needed in the Datum case. Typically, all tuples built
>>> * in-memory will be initialized with the Datum fields; but when a tuple
>>> is
>>> * about to be inserted in a table, the transaction fields will be filled,
>>> * overwriting the datum fields.
>>>
>>>
>>> especially the last line points as to what roles each of them plays,
>>> though, I would like to hear more about additional details from others
>>> who might reply.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Soroosh Sardari
>>> <soroosh(dot)sardari(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> > Dear Hackers
>>> >
>>> > In fix part oh HeapTuple, there is a union that is named t_choice,
>>> > union
>>> > {
>>> > HeapTupleFields t_heap;
>>> > DatumTupleFields t_datum;
>>> > } t_choice;
>>> >
>>> > I can't find out why we need t_datum, actually there is no comment about
>>> > DatumTupleFields.
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Soroosh
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Amit Langote
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Amit Langote

--
Amit Langote

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dickson S. Guedes 2013-05-20 12:51:12 Re: Better LWLocks with compare-and-swap (9.4)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-05-20 12:35:28 Re: Better LWLocks with compare-and-swap (9.4)