From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dan Birken <birken(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net |
Subject: | Re: pg_receivexlog 9.2 client working with 9.1 server? |
Date: | 2013-05-26 11:39:55 |
Message-ID: | CA+HiwqHJOfi=pXbSc7o3xCx=GrROrVpFZH+z8ydL7VwydOgCYQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Dan Birken <birken(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am running a pg_receivexlog 9.2 client against a 9.1 server. It seems to
> work. Comments in the code seem to indicate that this setup is workable.
>
> However, pg_receivexlog is not part of the 9.1 source tree nor the rpm
> package (as far as I see), so I am curious if there is some caveat that I
> sure be aware of, or some other incompatibility that makes this setup not
> work.
>
> The goal is to have PITR using a combination of pg_basebackup (which is part
> of 9.1) and pg_receivexlog.
I think it's okay using 9.2 pg_receievexlog with a 9.1 server.
--
Amit Langote
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | 高健 | 2013-05-27 01:56:18 | Re: There are many processes created and died frequently during PostgreSQl idle |
Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2013-05-25 20:18:31 | Re: 9.1: Slow to add range check on indexed column |