Re: pg_receivexlog 9.2 client working with 9.1 server?

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dan Birken <birken(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog 9.2 client working with 9.1 server?
Date: 2013-05-26 11:39:55
Message-ID: CA+HiwqHJOfi=pXbSc7o3xCx=GrROrVpFZH+z8ydL7VwydOgCYQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Dan Birken <birken(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am running a pg_receivexlog 9.2 client against a 9.1 server. It seems to
> work. Comments in the code seem to indicate that this setup is workable.
>
> However, pg_receivexlog is not part of the 9.1 source tree nor the rpm
> package (as far as I see), so I am curious if there is some caveat that I
> sure be aware of, or some other incompatibility that makes this setup not
> work.
>
> The goal is to have PITR using a combination of pg_basebackup (which is part
> of 9.1) and pg_receivexlog.

I think it's okay using 9.2 pg_receievexlog with a 9.1 server.

--
Amit Langote

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 高健 2013-05-27 01:56:18 Re: There are many processes created and died frequently during PostgreSQl idle
Previous Message Raymond O'Donnell 2013-05-25 20:18:31 Re: 9.1: Slow to add range check on indexed column