| From: | Tim <elatllat(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Aron Wieck <me(at)eunice(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: vacuumlo patch |
| Date: | 2011-08-07 08:23:26 |
| Message-ID: | CA+3zgmv-077szhTGE6tW6mpoeD5cdsYSpEa5ZHZFbFAAsQgmZg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Peter's message On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:49 AM:
> Please put the new option 'l' in some sensible order in the code and the
> help output (normally alphabetical). Also, there should probably be
> some update to the documentation.
>
I have alphabetized the help output, and one piece of code.
I'm hesitate to alphabetize some portions of the code because they are
grouped by type and not already alphabetized.
If I left something un-alphabetized please be explicit about about what
should be changed and why.
Documentation is now also in the patch.
Thanks for the tips.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| vacuumlo.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-08-07 09:01:22 | Re: Will switchover still need a checkpoint in 9.1 SR Hot Standby |
| Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2011-08-07 08:21:21 | Re: [RFC] Common object property boards |