From: | BladeOfLight16 <bladeoflight16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "janek12(at)web(dot)de" <janek12(at)web(dot)de> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sum of columns |
Date: | 2013-09-12 23:58:11 |
Message-ID: | CA+=1U=U7vQ1rXr4mqEttjXQRVw0iyC8b19epfKTmGQBJTATccQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Marc Mamin <M(dot)Mamin(at)intershop(dot)de> wrote:
> hi,
>
> in addition to the others comments, you can also remove " ELSE 0 " from
> your query.****
>
> It will result in <NULL> values that are discarded by SUM.****
>
>
For that matter, you could clean this up by using COUNT as your aggregate
with a GROUP BY. See these two archives:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+=1U=U-=OQv6P24PP7HrO3dvAf3mH-oELTT7+F7RWZsC1XkMQ@mail.gmail.com
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1377525567350-5768573.post@n5.nabble.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Travers | 2013-09-13 00:25:26 | Re: Best way to populate nested composite type from JSON` |
Previous Message | David Johnston | 2013-09-12 22:57:34 | Re: problem with query |