| From: | Caleb Welton <cwelton(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python |
| Date: | 2009-05-29 01:14:36 |
| Message-ID: | C644850C.2233%cwelton@greenplum.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
No. Still no sandbox.
-Caleb
On 5/28/09 6:06 PM, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
Does Python 3 have some sort of usable sandbox that would mean we could
have a trusted plpython?
Otherwise, I'm not too keen simply to throw Python 2.x overboard until
it's no longer common on platforms people are likely to want to install
Postgres on, if that's what's implied by the original question.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2009-05-29 01:23:28 | Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-05-29 01:08:23 | Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions |