Re: Hosted servers with good DB disk performance?

From: Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>
To: Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hosted servers with good DB disk performance?
Date: 2009-05-27 02:31:34
Message-ID: C641F416.6A98%scott@richrelevance.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 5/26/09 7:27 PM, "Scott Carey" <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com> wrote:
>
> For a permanent server, yes. But for a sort lease? You have to go with

Ahem ... 'short' not 'sort'.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2009-05-27 02:35:42 Re: Hosted servers with good DB disk performance?
Previous Message Scott Carey 2009-05-27 02:27:18 Re: Hosted servers with good DB disk performance?