Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.

From: "Syed, Rahila" <Rahila(dot)Syed(at)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Date: 2015-07-02 14:00:41
Message-ID: C3C878A2070C994B9AE61077D46C3846881534FC@MAIL703.KDS.KEANE.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

>Unless I am missing something, I guess you can still keep the actual code that updates counters outside the core if you adopt an approach that Simon suggests.
Yes. The code to extract progress information from VACUUM and storing in shared memory can be outside core even with pg_stat_activity as a user interface.

>Whatever the view (existing/new), any related counters would have a valid (non-NULL) value when read off the view iff hooks are set perhaps because you have an extension that sets them.
>I guess that means any operation that "supports" progress tracking would have an extension with suitable hooks implemented.
Do you mean to say , any operation/application that want progress tracking feature will dynamically load the progress checker module which will set the hooks for progress reporting?
If yes , unless I am missing something such dynamic loading cannot happen if we use pg_stat_activity as it gets values from shared memory. Module has to be a shared_preload_library
to allocate a shared memory. So this will mean the module can be loaded only at server restart. Am I missing something?

Thank you,
Rahila Syed

______________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence
for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged,
confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient,
please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete
and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying
or forwarding.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2015-07-02 14:01:46 Re: raw output from copy
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-07-02 13:58:07 Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers