Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Them who vote are them that make the decisions for them that don't. That's
how it works. The fact that <50% of the American population vote for its
president (with apologies for the US-centric view) doesn't make the vote
invalid or the group voting inappropriate.

I suggest we all just sit back and respect each others' views and opinions,
rather than trashing the very idea of the discussion.

Andy

On 9/3/07 3:39 PM, "Devrim GÜNDÜZ" <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 13:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> The totals are 15 for no change and 30 for a change to "Postgres".
>
> So ~ 45 votes among hundreds of subscribers? Even this low number proves
> that this discussion is useless, IMHO. -- let's spend our time for
> better things. Will this change make PostgreSQL faster? Or will it add a
> big major feature that will attract thousands of new users? I don't
> think so.
>
> Regards,