Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem

From: "MauMau" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Dimitri Fontaine" <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Date: 2013-10-12 00:26:22
Message-ID: C1DAEA9369E7492C907714DEF815909D@maumau
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: "Dimitri Fontaine" <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
> "MauMau" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Although this is not directly related to memory, could you set
>> max_prepared_transactions = max_connections at initdb time? People must
>
> You really need to have a transaction manager around when issuing
> prepared transaction as failing to commit/rollback them will prevent
> VACUUM and quickly lead you to an interesting situation.

I understand this problem occurs only when the user configured the
application server to use distributed transactions, the application server
crashed between prepare and commit/rollback, and the user doesn't recover
the application server. So only improper operation produces the problem.
Just setting max_prepared_transactions to non-zero doesn't cause the
problem. Is this correct?

Regards
MauMau

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2013-10-12 05:30:35 Re: Triggers on foreign tables
Previous Message MauMau 2013-10-12 00:14:36 Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem