Re: more anti-postgresql FUD

From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Date: 2006-10-12 13:29:04
Message-ID: C1539F40.57A5F%scott_ribe@killerbytes.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> Used to run a time reporting system on a 3b2
> 400, 4MB Ram, WE32100 10MHz processor, 1.1 MIPS.

You had zeroes? We had to use the letter "O"!

--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ANJANE 2006-10-12 13:30:34 cursors and ASP page
Previous Message Rob Richardson 2006-10-12 13:17:44 Can a function determine whether a primary key constraint exists on a table?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-10-12 13:29:27 Re: Subject: problem with using O_DIRECT
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-10-12 13:25:29 Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features