Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]
Date: 2011-01-12 18:52:42
Message-ID: C131AD39-1B29-4B35-A89B-92E5F4944119@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 12, 2011, at 5:14 AM, Alexey Klyukin wrote:

> You mean packing both a string representation and a reference to a single SV * value?

Dunno, I'm not a guts guy.

> I haven't considered that (lack of extensive perlgus-foo) although I think that's an interesting idea. One drawback would be that it would require both conversion to a string format and to a perl reference, performing unnecessary actions during every time arrays are passed to a pl/perl function. If there is a strong dislike of the proposed 'compatibility' GUC option - I think I can change the existing patch to incorporate array string representation into the reference-holding SV quite easily.

Andrew's objections have merit. So perhaps just add this patch to the commit fest as is?

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-01-12 18:54:11 Re: WIP: Range Types
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-01-12 18:27:00 Re: Compatibility GUC for serializable