| From: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Steve Poe" <steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Alex Turner" <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and |
| Date: | 2006-08-08 16:22:15 |
| Message-ID: | C0FE0847.2D986%llonergan@greenplum.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Steve,
On 8/8/06 8:01 AM, "Steve Poe" <steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I use the same database test that I've run a Sun
> dual Opteron with 4Gb RAM and (2) four disk arrays in RAID10. The sun box with
> one disc on an LSI MegaRAID 2-channel adapter outperforms this HP box. I
> though I was doing something wrong or there is something wrong with the box.
Given the circumstances (benchmarked I/O is great, comparable perf on
another box with single disk is better), seems that one of:
1) something wrong with the CPU/memory on the box
2) something with the OS version / kernel
3) something with the postgres configuration
Can you post the database benchmark results?
- Luke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Poe | 2006-08-08 16:57:43 | Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and |
| Previous Message | Steve Poe | 2006-08-08 15:01:47 | Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and |