Re: On-disk bitmap index patch

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Jie Zhang" <jzhang(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Mark Kirkwood" <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On-disk bitmap index patch
Date: 2006-07-28 19:17:53
Message-ID: C0EFB0F2.2B299%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim,

On 7/28/06 10:17 AM, "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:

> If the usefulness of bitmap indexes is still in doubt, could someone at
> Greenplum provide data from actual data warehouses from actual
> customers?

First, is anyone in doubt?

- Luke

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-28 19:25:06 Re: [HACKERS] pg_regress breaks on msys
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-07-28 19:14:33 Re: Hash indexes (was: On-disk bitmap index patch)