Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Thomas Hallgren" <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down
Date: 2006-02-19 21:29:51
Message-ID: C01E234F.1CD0B%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

FYI - as a positive enhancement, Greenplum donated a beefy server to host
pgFoundry.

- Luke

On 2/18/06 10:34 AM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> writes:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Having run had both pgfoundary and gborg for several years, I think we
>>> have to conclude that any clean migration is never going to happen, so
>>> let's just pick a server and announce date, and shut one of them off.
>
>> I've repeatedly asked for help moving my PL/Java stuff over to pgfoundry and
>> offered my help
>> in the process,
>
> Indeed, we haven't made any particular effort to encourage gborg
> projects to move. I think it's a bit premature to hold a gun to
> their heads.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-02-19 21:35:56 Re: Domains and supporting functions
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-02-19 21:29:35 Re: Domains and supporting functions