| From: | Haifeng Liu <liuhaifeng(at)live(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Confuse about the behaveior of PreparedStatement.executeBatch (jdbc) |
| Date: | 2012-12-13 10:44:56 |
| Message-ID: | BLU0-SMTP1143B3C57133A122263A47AB94E0@phx.gbl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
Hi,
I have a DB writer program written in Java, it do batch updates, and will try to update each record in a batch if it failed. I think no any record in a batch will be update if the batch failed, but weirdly I found a few records update twice(very little amount among all records).
Well, there is less stuff about postgresql jdbc driver. I wanna know if executeBatch really keep all the records in a batch untouched when the batch failed. Any help is appreciate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bèrto ëd Sèra | 2012-12-13 12:39:28 | pooler/router? |
| Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2012-12-13 05:35:36 | Re: 9.1 Streaming Replication |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Cowell | 2012-12-13 12:26:14 | Re: Corrupt indexes on slave when using pg_bulkload on master |
| Previous Message | seiliki | 2012-12-13 09:31:04 | Trouble with PQnotifies() |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2012-12-13 21:01:55 | Re: performance problem of Failover Datasource? |
| Previous Message | Chen Huajun | 2012-12-13 10:42:10 | Re: performance problem of Failover Datasource? |