On 31/12/05 14:35, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> wrote:
> Which brings a point - with NLS being so troublesome on win32, perhaps
> one of the machines building on the buildfarm could be reconfigured to
> not build with NLS?
Not a bad idea. I'd suggest it's not Snake though, as that box is kept in
sync compiler/config/dependency-wise with the machine that the distributions
are built on.
Regards, Dave.