Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: stange(at)rentec(dot)com
Cc: "Dave Cramer" <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Joshua Marsh" <icub3d(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date: 2005-11-18 15:27:42
Message-ID: BFA332EE.14035%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Alan,

On 11/18/05 6:46 AM, "Alan Stange" <stange(at)rentec(dot)com> wrote:

> That's 3 hours under load, with 80 compute clients beating on the
> database at the same time. We have the stats turned way up, so the
> analyze tends to read a big chunk of the tables a second time as
> well. We typically don't have three hours a day of idle time.

So I guess you¹re saying you don¹t know what your I/O rate is?

- Luke

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luke Lonergan 2005-11-18 15:30:31 Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2005-11-18 15:25:52 Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (