Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jeff -" <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2
Date: 2005-08-30 06:35:26
Message-ID: BF394C3E.E1FF%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

On 8/29/05 9:37 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Did that. Set shmall first, shmall second, both together in one sysctl
> command; no joy anywhere. Are you trying this on fully up-to-date
> Tiger?

Did you try the values I sent earlier? If you set them both in
/etc/sysctl.conf and reboot, it should work. We get 100% repeatability on
10.4.2 platforms.

- Luke

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-08-30 07:37:04 Re: Performance gain from reduction of GROUP BY memory
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-30 04:37:46 Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2