Re: COPY fast parse patch

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Alon Goldshuv" <agoldshuv(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: COPY fast parse patch
Date: 2005-06-03 01:03:40
Message-ID: BEC4FA7C.6D09%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

FYI - we're prepping a proposal for just that. Stay tuned for Alon's
proposal.

Luke

On 6/1/05 11:43 PM, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 00:53 -0400, Alon Goldshuv wrote:
>> My thoughts were -- see how the responses are, and if people think
>> that this is a better way to go than replace the COPY parsing logic to
>> the new one.
>
> If the new approach to parsing can handle all the cases that the old
> approach can handle (WRT CSV, binary, encoding conversion and the like)
> and is faster to boot, I don't see a reason not to replace the current
> approach with something derived from your patch.
>
> -Neil
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-06-03 01:25:06 Re: psql: \d+ show tablespace of indices
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-06-03 00:37:39 Re: O_DIRECT for WAL writes