Re: Backup strategy

From: Adam Witney <awitney(at)sghms(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To: Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Backup strategy
Date: 2005-01-18 22:31:43
Message-ID: BE133ECF.3F0F8%awitney@sghms.ac.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 18/1/05 8:38 pm, "Lonni J Friedman" <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:23:23 +0000, Adam Witney <awitney(at)sghms(dot)ac(dot)uk> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am setting up the backup strategy for my database.
>>
>> The database contains around 25 tables containing quite a lot of data that
>> does not change very much (and when it does it is changed by me). And around
>> 20 tables containing data which will be created and updated by the users
>> regularly.
>>
>> I would like to backup the two sets of data separately at different
>> intervals. The first set only when I update it and the second set several
>> times per day.
>>
>> Would it be best to set up a separate schema for the "static" tables? If so
>> what would be the simplest and safest way to transfer these tables into a
>> new schema?
>>
>> Thanks for any help
>
> pg_dump allows you to backup individual tables. Once you do that, you
> could import them into a new database.

Would this take care of sequences and any other associated objects also?

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2005-01-18 22:45:12 Re: high unicode chars
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-01-18 21:43:30 Re: high unicode chars