From: | Adam Witney <awitney(at)sghms(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Backup strategy |
Date: | 2005-01-18 22:31:43 |
Message-ID: | BE133ECF.3F0F8%awitney@sghms.ac.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 18/1/05 8:38 pm, "Lonni J Friedman" <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:23:23 +0000, Adam Witney <awitney(at)sghms(dot)ac(dot)uk> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am setting up the backup strategy for my database.
>>
>> The database contains around 25 tables containing quite a lot of data that
>> does not change very much (and when it does it is changed by me). And around
>> 20 tables containing data which will be created and updated by the users
>> regularly.
>>
>> I would like to backup the two sets of data separately at different
>> intervals. The first set only when I update it and the second set several
>> times per day.
>>
>> Would it be best to set up a separate schema for the "static" tables? If so
>> what would be the simplest and safest way to transfer these tables into a
>> new schema?
>>
>> Thanks for any help
>
> pg_dump allows you to backup individual tables. Once you do that, you
> could import them into a new database.
Would this take care of sequences and any other associated objects also?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2005-01-18 22:45:12 | Re: high unicode chars |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-18 21:43:30 | Re: high unicode chars |