From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net |
Subject: | Re: simply custom variables protection |
Date: | 2007-03-11 05:27:29 |
Message-ID: | BAY20-F15B5DA7A4644341AF5A021F97E0@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
>"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> > this patch contains function ArmorCustomVariables. This function set
>flag
> > armored on any custom variable. From this moment only superuser can
>change
> > this variable.
>
>Why is this a good idea? Why don't you just fix the problem as
>previously agreed, namely make the GUC context values work properly
>for custom variables?
>
I am sorry, I don't see it. In my solution module knows own variables and
can chose what want to do with its. So if I like ro variables, then I add
into module init calling ResetPgVariables() and ArmorCustomVariables(), and
without anything the behave is same like current.What do you though.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
_________________________________________________________________
Chcete sdilet sve obrazky a hudbu s prateli? http://messenger.msn.cz/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-03-11 23:05:29 | Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option (patch) |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2007-03-11 04:44:17 | Fix race condition in size functions |