Re: PL/pgSQL Todo, better information in errcontext from plpgsql

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL Todo, better information in errcontext from plpgsql
Date: 2006-10-08 16:26:18
Message-ID: BAY114-F5BDC06933365829AC7416F9110@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>
>>>Why do you need the OID to know exactly what function something is?
>>>What's wrong with schema.function(args)?
>>>--
>>
>>oid is simply unique. I can take source code, args and all without
>>parsing. It's only one difference. I unlike parsing.
>
>decibel=# select 'pg_catalog.abstimelt
>(abstime,abstime)'::regprocedure::oid;
>oid
>-----
>253
>

hmm, it changes situation. With it OID isn't really necessery. i didn't know
it before.

Regards
Pavel Stehule

_________________________________________________________________
Chcete sdilet sve obrazky a hudbu s prateli? http://messenger.msn.cz/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-08 16:41:04 Re: Checking max_stack_depth automatically
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-08 15:58:19 Re: Checking max_stack_depth automatically