Re: Out Of Memory 8.1

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "French, Martin" <frenchm(at)cromwell(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Out Of Memory 8.1
Date: 2011-04-08 07:46:41
Message-ID: BANLkTintWVhB3YMXM=oZePe+=t-GXX37cA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:56 AM, French, Martin <frenchm(at)cromwell(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
> Thanks for the info Tom.
>
> The table has been analyzed (somewhat repeatedly...), with the stats
> target set at various limits.
>
> At the moment default_statistics_target = 50.
>
> I've had work_mem as low as 1MB and as high as 128MB, with little to no
> avail.
>
> Setting enable_hashagg = off, does allow the query to complete, but
> mashes the next query in the batch with it having to be killed at 8
> hours. Setting it off for this query alone causes the next query to do
> exactly the same.
>
> The thing that perplexes me is; that on RHEL 5.0 with all the same
> settings and data, the query works fine... so it's confusing as to what
> can have changed so much to cause this. I know that we had to move to
> RHEL 5.4 because of PERC Raid drivers, but I wouldn't have thought that
> would've made too much of a difference.

So what's the difference between the query plans on the two machines?
Any difference in non-default settings in postgresql.conf between the
two machines?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lea 2011-04-08 08:55:00 Re: pg_start_backup - backups
Previous Message raghu ram 2011-04-08 06:56:43 Re: Reindexing pg_catalog