Re: big distinct clause vs. group by

From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter(at)googlemail(dot)com>
To: Uwe Bartels <uwe(dot)bartels(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: big distinct clause vs. group by
Date: 2011-04-19 09:07:38
Message-ID: BANLkTindpLiBP7faprcJvUVC=2zE7ZDJBg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Uwe Bartels <uwe(dot)bartels(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Oh, I do care about these columns.
> But by using an group by on the key columns, I cannot select the columns as
> they are. Otherwise you get an error message.
> So I have to use an aggregate functionlike min().

I find that slightly contradictory: either you do care about the
values then your business requirements dictate the aggregate function.
If you only want to pick any value actually in the table but do not
care about which one (e.g. MIN or MAX or any other) then you don't
actually care about the value. Because "SELECT a, MAX(b) ... GROUP BY
a" and "SELECT a, MIN(b) ... GROUP BY a" are not equivalent. And, if
you do not care then there is probably no point in selecting them at
all. At best you could use a constant for any legal value then.

Cheers

robert

--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurent Laborde 2011-04-19 09:15:30 postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
Previous Message Robert Klemme 2011-04-19 08:57:49 Re: How to configure a read-only database server?