| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch |
| Date: | 2011-06-07 18:06:32 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTinBGrQwW0s_BQ32vA1z=457LMfBDw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> As long as we have solidarity of the committers that this is not allowed, however, this is not a real problem. And it appears that we do. In the future, it shouldn't even be necessary to discuss it.
>
> Solidarity?
>
> Simon - who was a committer last time I checked - seems to think that
> the current process is entirely bunko.
I'm not sure why anyone that disagrees with you should be accused of
wanting to junk the whole process. I've not said that and I don't
think this.
Before you arrived, it was quite normal to suggest tuning patches
after feature freeze.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-07 18:10:05 | Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-07 18:05:10 | Re: BUG #6041: Unlogged table was created bad in slave node |