Re: InitProcGlobal cleanup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: InitProcGlobal cleanup
Date: 2011-06-02 19:16:28
Message-ID: BANLkTin2TpCjFOGde68A2cOUDACoE-gLbw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> OK, here's a version with more comments.
>
> Looks OK to me, assuming you've checked that the right number of PGPROCs
> are getting created (in particular the AV launcher is no longer
> accounted for explicitly).

That should be fine, due to the way MaxBackends is initialized. See
related comment around guc.c:103.

I'll commit this to 9.2 after we branch. (When are we doing that, BTW?)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2011-06-02 19:22:49 Re: Identifying no-op length coercions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-02 19:13:42 Re: InitProcGlobal cleanup