Re: wrong message on REASSIGN OWNED

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: wrong message on REASSIGN OWNED
Date: 2011-06-13 14:03:28
Message-ID: BANLkTimd78YLCPVBfsMBME-uRa1x6qnhQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> btw, i'm allowed to use ALTER TABLE to assign a new owner (even an
>>> unprivileged one) to a system catalog, probably that's a bug.
>
>> +1 for tightening that up in 9.2.
>
> Nonsense.  You won't like the results of "DELETE FROM pg_proc;" either,
> but we don't try to put training wheels on superusers.

allow_system_table_mods?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-06-13 14:03:49 Re: PATCH: CreateComments: use explicit indexing for ``values''
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-13 13:57:50 Re: wrong message on REASSIGN OWNED