Re: adding a new column in IDENTIFY_SYSTEM

From: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: adding a new column in IDENTIFY_SYSTEM
Date: 2011-05-24 23:26:22
Message-ID: BANLkTimD4Upn=9bnVg1ob58JikybbBniVw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Yes. It might be useful to note it, and then ust make an override
> flag. My pointm, though, was that doing it for walreceiver is more
> important and a more logical first step.
>

ok, patch attached.

--
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
identify_system_xlogversion_v3.patch text/x-patch 7.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Ports 2011-05-25 00:25:54 Re: SSI predicate locking on heap -- tuple or row?
Previous Message MauMau 2011-05-24 22:40:44 Re: Cannot build docs of 9.1 on Windows