Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix
Date: 2011-06-16 12:42:39
Message-ID: BANLkTim0qzMx5x6BbG5SKBUFDPXGYiCAbw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16 June 2011 13:15, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> Hmm, I'm not sure having the pid in that error message is too useful in the
> first place. The process was just spawned, and it will die at that error.
> When you try to debug that sort of error, what you would compare the pid
> with? And you can include the pid in log_line_prefix if it turns out to be
> useful after all.

All fair points. FWIW, I think it's pretty unlikely that anyone will
ever see this error message.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Radosław Smogura 2011-06-16 12:51:19 Re: Patch - Debug builds without optimization
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-06-16 12:36:42 reminder: buildfarm members need to add 9.1