Re: ITYM DROP TABLE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ITYM DROP TABLE
Date: 2011-06-14 12:52:59
Message-ID: BANLkTikxyt0o-0Jd6Q6Cgn-n+2xkT_HVHw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:44 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> I was reading the partitioning docs when I spotted this. I think it means to highlight the advantages of DROP TABLE over DELETE rather than ALTER TABLE.

I guess they might mean ALTER TABLE .. NO INHERIT. But I think I
agree that DROP TABLE would be better.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-06-14 12:58:33 Re: SSI patch renumbered existing 2PC resource managers??
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-06-14 12:44:32 Re: Creating new remote branch in git?