Re: Index Size

From: Nick Raj <nickrajjain(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index Size
Date: 2011-05-31 03:33:39
Message-ID: BANLkTikanBd9qWx8Xccgi7foLifUCNifxQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > On 05/30/2011 08:53 PM, Nick Raj wrote:
> >> Cube code provided by postgres contrib folder. It uses the NDBOX
> structure.
> >> On creating index, it's size increase at a high rate.
>
> > [snip]
>
> >> Can some one tell me why index is becoming so large?
> >> How to compress or reduce its size?
>
> > It'd help if you included some more details:
>
> > - Your PostgreSQL version
>
> In particular, I wonder whether his version contains this fix:
>
> Author: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Branch: master [4fa0a23c7] 2010-11-14 21:27:34 -0500
> Branch: REL9_0_STABLE Release: REL9_0_2 [e6b380251] 2010-11-14 21:27:34
> -0500
> Branch: REL8_4_STABLE Release: REL8_4_6 [2519b8268] 2010-11-14 21:27:34
> -0500
> Branch: REL8_3_STABLE Release: REL8_3_13 [d589e4070] 2010-11-14 21:27:34
> -0500
> Branch: REL8_2_STABLE Release: REL8_2_19 [e642ca767] 2010-11-14 21:27:34
> -0500
> Branch: REL8_1_STABLE Release: REL8_1_23 [0e27a7319] 2010-11-14 21:27:34
> -0500
>
> Fix bug in cube picksplit algorithm.
>
> Alexander Korotkov
>
>
>

Is this bug fixed?
postgresql 9.0 having this bug or not?

Thanks

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-05-31 04:09:18 Re: trigger - dynamic WHERE clause
Previous Message Toby Corkindale 2011-05-31 03:20:40 Re: Shared Buffer Size