Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)
Date: 2011-06-19 13:48:58
Message-ID: BANLkTikRsbzJ=yJYp-YMRxkNv3Tb8s6kCQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>  (I will refrain for
> the moment from speculating whether we'll ever have an index type that
> supports regexp match directly as an indexable operator...)

Fwiw I looked into this at one point and have some ideas if anyone is
keen to try it.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-06-19 13:52:59 Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors
Previous Message Greg Stark 2011-06-19 13:38:21 Re: [WIP] cache estimates, cache access cost