Hi Vitalii,

this sounds promising, can you send me that?

Best Regards,
Uwe


2011/4/25 Віталій Тимчишин <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>

>
>
> 2011/4/23 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
>
>> On Apr 18, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Uwe Bartels <uwe(dot)bartels(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Hi Robert,
>> >
>> > thanks for your answer.
>> > the aggregate function I was talking about is the function I need to use
>> for the non-group by columns like min() in my example.
>> > There are of course several function to choose from, and I wanted to
>> know which causes as less as possible resources.
>>
>> Oh, I see. min() is probably as good as anything. You could also create a
>> custom aggregate that just always returns its first input. I've occasionally
>> wished we had such a thing as a built-in.
>>
>>
> I've once done "single" grouping function - it checks that all it's input
> values are equal (non-null ones) and returns the value or raises an error if
> there are two different values.
>
> Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  Vitalii Tymchyshyn
>

In response to

• Re: big distinct clause vs. group by at 2011-04-25 14:22:23 from Віталій Тимчишин

pgsql-performance by date

Next:	From: J Sisson	Date: 2011-04-25 19:30:59
	Subject: Time to put theory to the test?
Previous:	From: Josh Berkus	Date: 2011-04-25 18:06:47
	Subject: Re: Issue with partition elimination