Re: branching for 9.2devel

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> On balance, I think I prefer the
>> current arrangement, though if we could make the CommitFests a bit
>> shorter I would certainly like that better.  I don't know how to make
>> that happen without more reviewers, though.
>
> Given our current method (where we allow authors to update their patches
> during a CF) I don't see that we need or should try for shorter CFs.  If
> we actually just reviewed patches onces it'd be a very different
> situation.
>
> So, +1 from me for keeping it as-is.  I do wonder if this is coming up
> now just because we're getting closer to a release and people are,
> unsuprisingly, wishing they had been able to get their fav. patch in
> before the deadline. :)

+1 from me for keeping it as-is as well.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services