Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry

From: Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Date: 2011-06-01 23:44:20
Message-ID: BANLkTik4ReM85jyq+B+H+MtiZApQqeDPNg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> - Suggest users migrate to GitHub or Sourceforge, depending on their needs.
>>
>> - Migrate "core" projects (such as psqlODBC and the press/advocacy
>> project) to mailing lists in postgresql.org (if required) and to
>> git.postgresql.org.
>
> Is pgpool counted on the "core" projects? I want to use
> git.postgresql.org as the main pgpool repository if possible.
>
> It seems there are lots of "non core" projects including bucard,
> pgAdmin, plproxy, skytools, slony and so on, BTW.

I think that Dave (or someone else upthread) was using the word
"family" earlier, which I think fits a bit better than "core".

I consider pgpool family! :)

-selena

--
http://chesnok.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2011-06-02 08:11:47 Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2011-06-01 23:35:42 Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry